Juniper Service Provider Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JN0-692) Free Practice Test
Question 1
Click the Exhibit button.
Your company (AS 65501) is bringing up a new EBGP peering with a new customer site (AS 65530). Your EBGP peering was preconfigured and the customer has recently configured their side. The EBGP peering session has failed to establish and you have been asked to review the information shown in the exhibit to determine the problem.
Which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
Your company (AS 65501) is bringing up a new EBGP peering with a new customer site (AS 65530). Your EBGP peering was preconfigured and the customer has recently configured their side. The EBGP peering session has failed to establish and you have been asked to review the information shown in the exhibit to determine the problem.
Which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,D
Question 2
Click the Exhibit button.
You have been asked to establish an IPv6 EBGP peering between R1 and a customer's router. You have an existing IPv4 EBGP peering to this device. After adding the IPv6 neighbor configuration to the existing EBGP group configuration, the IPv4 neighborship is down and will not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, what should you do to resolve this problem?
You have been asked to establish an IPv6 EBGP peering between R1 and a customer's router. You have an existing IPv4 EBGP peering to this device. After adding the IPv6 neighbor configuration to the existing EBGP group configuration, the IPv4 neighborship is down and will not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, what should you do to resolve this problem?
Correct Answer: C
Question 3
You are monitoring the control plane traffic using a network analyzer on an Ethernet network segment with all routers configured with IS-IS routing. Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: A,B
Question 4
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group myEBGP {
import noTransit;
peer-as 318;
neighbor ;
}
[edit] user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement noTransit { term rejectAS1524 { from as-path AS1524; then accept; }
} as-path AS1524 *1524*; -- Exhibit -
To block transit traffic from AS1524, you have configured and committed the configuration as shown in the exhibit. However, traffic from AS1524 is still flowing through your AS.
Which two changes must you implement to resolve the problem? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit -
[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group myEBGP {
import noTransit;
peer-as 318;
neighbor ;
}
[edit] user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement noTransit { term rejectAS1524 { from as-path AS1524; then accept; }
} as-path AS1524 *1524*; -- Exhibit -
To block transit traffic from AS1524, you have configured and committed the configuration as shown in the exhibit. However, traffic from AS1524 is still flowing through your AS.
Which two changes must you implement to resolve the problem? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,D
Question 5
You have recently implemented a new Layer 2 VPN and it is not establishing. The show l2vpn connections command displays an out-of-range state.
What is causing this problem?
What is causing this problem?
Correct Answer: C
Question 6
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
user@P1# show policy-options policy-statement imp-bgp1 term 1 {
from {
protocol bgp;
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger;
}
then {
preference 245;
}
}
user@P1# show protocols bgp group IBGP
local-address 172.24.255.1;
family inet {
unicast; } family inet-vpn {
unicast; } cluster 172.24.255.1; peer-as 50; neighbor 172.24.255.3; neighbor 172.24.255.2 {
local-preference 200;
import imp-bgp1; } neighbor 172.24.255.4; -- Exhibit -
The operator of the network shown in the exhibit wants to make 172.24.255.2 the preferred path for routes. However, the router still prefers a different peer.
What is the problem?
-- Exhibit -
user@P1# show policy-options policy-statement imp-bgp1 term 1 {
from {
protocol bgp;
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger;
}
then {
preference 245;
}
}
user@P1# show protocols bgp group IBGP
local-address 172.24.255.1;
family inet {
unicast; } family inet-vpn {
unicast; } cluster 172.24.255.1; peer-as 50; neighbor 172.24.255.3; neighbor 172.24.255.2 {
local-preference 200;
import imp-bgp1; } neighbor 172.24.255.4; -- Exhibit -
The operator of the network shown in the exhibit wants to make 172.24.255.2 the preferred path for routes. However, the router still prefers a different peer.
What is the problem?
Correct Answer: C