Juniper Junos Troubleshooting (JN0-691) Free Practice Test
Question 1
What is a common cause for an OSPF peering session stuck in Exstart?
Correct Answer: B
Question 2
Which CLI command is used to restart a software process?
Correct Answer: C
Question 3
An engineer upgraded a router to an incorrect version of the Junos OS and performed the system snapshot function.
Which two actions would return the system to the original version? (Choose two.)
Which two actions would return the system to the original version? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: C,D
Question 4
-- Exhibit --
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ge-1/1/2 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/2 up up
ge-1/1/2.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ge-1/1/3 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/3 up up
ge-1/1/3.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ae0 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ae0 up down
ae0.0 up down bridge
[edit]
user@R1# show interfaces ae0
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
periodic slow;
system-priority 200;
}
}
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list 100;
}
}
**************************************************************************
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ge-1/1/2 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/2 up up
ge-1/1/2.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ge-1/1/3 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/3 up up
ge-1/1/3.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ae0 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ae0 up down
ae0.0 up down bridge
[edit]
user@R2# show interfaces ae0
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
periodic fast;
system-priority 100;
}
}
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list 100;
}
}
-- Exhibit --
You have configured a LAG and are now enabling LACP on the ae0 interface. You have configured and committed the configuration as shown in the exhibit. However, the exhibit also shows that the ae0 interface is now in the up/down state.
What must you do to resolve this problem?
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ge-1/1/2 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/2 up up
ge-1/1/2.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ge-1/1/3 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/3 up up
ge-1/1/3.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R1# run show interfaces ae0 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ae0 up down
ae0.0 up down bridge
[edit]
user@R1# show interfaces ae0
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
periodic slow;
system-priority 200;
}
}
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list 100;
}
}
**************************************************************************
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ge-1/1/2 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/2 up up
ge-1/1/2.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ge-1/1/3 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ge-1/1/3 up up
ge-1/1/3.0 up up aenet --> ae0.0
[edit]
user@R2# run show interfaces ae0 terse
Interface Admin Link Proto Local Remote
ae0 up down
ae0.0 up down bridge
[edit]
user@R2# show interfaces ae0
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
periodic fast;
system-priority 100;
}
}
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list 100;
}
}
-- Exhibit --
You have configured a LAG and are now enabling LACP on the ae0 interface. You have configured and committed the configuration as shown in the exhibit. However, the exhibit also shows that the ae0 interface is now in the up/down state.
What must you do to resolve this problem?
Correct Answer: B
Question 5
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
May 20 22:27:04.010297 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:04.010320 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:04.010342 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:04.010365 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:04.010387 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:07.891698 OSPF periodic xmit from 192.168.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276180 area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.749988 OSPF packet ignored:area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 on intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:12.750071 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:12.750095 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1 May 20 22:27:12.750116 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:12.750139 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:12.750161 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393182 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:14.393262 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393284 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:14.393307 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 50, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:14.393368 dead_ivl 200, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393399 OSPF packet ignored:our router ID received from 192.168.0.2 on
intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which two OSPF adjacency problems are present? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit -
May 20 22:27:04.010297 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:04.010320 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:04.010342 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:04.010365 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:04.010387 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:07.891698 OSPF periodic xmit from 192.168.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276180 area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.749988 OSPF packet ignored:area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 on intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:12.750071 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:12.750095 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1 May 20 22:27:12.750116 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:12.750139 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:12.750161 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393182 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:14.393262 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393284 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:14.393307 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 50, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:14.393368 dead_ivl 200, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393399 OSPF packet ignored:our router ID received from 192.168.0.2 on
intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which two OSPF adjacency problems are present? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,C
Question 6
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
user@R1> show configuration interfaces lo0
unit 5 {
family inet {
filter {
input JUNOS;
}
address 5.5.5.5/32;
}
}
user@R1> show configuration firewall family inet filter JUNOS
term term1 {
from {
protocol tcp;
port [ telnet ftp ftp-data snmp ssh syslog http tacacs 64644 1024-65535 ];
}
then {
log;
accept;
}
}
term default {
then {
discard;
}
}
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which three statements are true? (Choose three.)
-- Exhibit --
user@R1> show configuration interfaces lo0
unit 5 {
family inet {
filter {
input JUNOS;
}
address 5.5.5.5/32;
}
}
user@R1> show configuration firewall family inet filter JUNOS
term term1 {
from {
protocol tcp;
port [ telnet ftp ftp-data snmp ssh syslog http tacacs 64644 1024-65535 ];
}
then {
log;
accept;
}
}
term default {
then {
discard;
}
}
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which three statements are true? (Choose three.)
Correct Answer: B,C,D
Question 7
You are asked to configure traceoptions to capture all general events for rpd.
Which configuration statement accomplishes this task?
Which configuration statement accomplishes this task?
Correct Answer: B
Question 8
Which three commands will provide details about CPU utilization on a line card? (Choose three.)
Correct Answer: A,B,E
Question 9
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -user@router> show system users 9:28PM up 2 days, 3:02, 2 users, load averages: 0.06, 0.13, 0.09 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT lab u0 - 9:13PM - -cli (cli) admin p0 10.210.15.30 9:45PM - -cli (cli) -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit -user@router> show system users 9:28PM up 2 days, 3:02, 2 users, load averages: 0.06, 0.13, 0.09 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT lab u0 - 9:13PM - -cli (cli) admin p0 10.210.15.30 9:45PM - -cli (cli) -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,C