Assess: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics V7.1 Implementation (A2010-568) Free Practice Test

Question 1

A customer has a large WebSphere environment which requires high availability fail-over for the managing server. Which architecture should be used?

A. a Hub Monitoring Server with two remote managing servers

B. two IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics management regions with two-way event forwarding between these two regions

C. a single managing server

D. split managing server components into multi servers

Correct Answer: D

Question 2

What are three steps to properly deploy a Maintenance Delivery Vehicle (MDV) into an IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM) Infrastructure that is supporting IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics V7.1 (ITCAM for AD)? (Choose three.)

A. install application support to the Tivoli Data Warehouse

B. install the MDV to the ITCAM for Application Diagnostics monitoring agent(s) and reconfigure

C. install application support to the Hub TEMS and any Remote TEMS that are managing any ITCAM for AD monitoring agents

D. restart the monitored application server

E. obtain and stage the MDV

F. install application support to the TEP Web client

Correct Answer: B,C,E

Question 3

Using the Managing Server Visualization Engine, how is the version of an Application Server's JVM determined?

A. Top Reports

B. Software Consistency Check

C. System Properties

D. JVM Thread Display

Correct Answer: B

Question 4

What is the Managing Server's default Baseline Definition percentage for slow and very slow response?

A. 10% and 20%

B. 25% and 50%

C. 50% and 75%

D. 75% and 100%

Correct Answer: B

Question 5

Using the memory option Memory Leak Diagnosis, what is the most efficient way to determine if an application has a memory leak in a test environment?

A. Run a steady load for the suspected application for a given time. Stop the application. After several GC cycles, review the # of Objects Surviving Last GC field to determine which object is the leak.

B. Run a continual steady load for the suspected application. Review the % Growth field to determine which object is the leak.

C. Run a steady load for the suspected application for a given time. Stop the application. After several GC cycles, review the % Growth field to determine which object is the leak.

D. Run a continual steady load for the suspected application. Review the # of Objects Surviving Last GC to determine which object is the leak.

Correct Answer: A

Question 6

An IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics V7.1 environment is being fine tuned at a customer site. Which parameter is likely to be excluded from changes that are made?

A. network.collector.publish.frequency

B. datacollector.frequency

C. networkagent.publish.frequency

D. datacollector.publish.frequency

Correct Answer: C

Question 7

A customer suspects that the WAS application is having memory issues. How can the customer monitor heap size usage after garbage collection cycle with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics V7.1 Agent for WebSphere Applications?

A. a custom situation must be created for the customer

B. use a predefined situation: WASOutofHeapSpace

C. it is only possible in deep-dive diagnostics using a managing server

D. use a predefined situation: WASAvgHeapSizeAfterGCHigh

Correct Answer: D

Welcome to TestSimulate

IBM Assess: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics V7.1 Implementation (A2010-568) Free Practice Test